序言 | Foreword

20 世纪行将结束之时,人们大部分的乐观情绪已经消退了。曾经生产钢铁、玻璃、家具或鞋子的中心地带的城镇,那些承载了这批70 岁左右的耄耋老人们美好成长回忆的地方,现在已经被摧毁了,他们的工厂关闭了,商店也被封锁了。在残骸中,酒精和毒品的诱惑着人们走向死亡。这些故事中的大多数从未被讲述过。 [1]
 
出生在第一次世界大战后二十年的美国人在繁荣和希望的氛围中长大。 1945 年至 1970 年间,美国的商品和服务产量翻了两番,国内的大部分地区出现了高速公路、汽车旅馆和办公楼,呈出现代化样貌。到 1971 年,几乎每个美国家庭都有冰箱、洗衣机、电视和吸尘器,三分之一的人拥有不止一辆汽车。 [2]当然当时也有这样或那样的问题,但工资,尤其是体力劳动者的工资正在上涨,阻碍种族平等的一些最严重的法律条款正在逐渐被废除,并且,至少一开始,越战毫无意义的残酷可怖还未广为人知。
 
但随着那些年出生的孩子开始工作,大门开始关闭。麻烦始于俄亥俄州、宾夕法尼亚州和纽约州北部的工业城镇,然后蔓延到全国。 1976 年和 1977 年,Bethlehem钢铁公司在纽约Lackawanna解雇了 3,500 名工人,在俄亥俄州Johnstown解雇了 3,500 名工人,仅仅一个夏天,那里的失业率就翻了三倍。在宾夕法尼亚州的小康舒霍肯(人口 10,000),Alan Wood钢铁公司 解雇了 3,000 人。随着工厂缩小规模、迁往国外或完全关闭,未来几十年将失去数百万个良好的制造业工作岗位。即使一些下岗工人得到了遣散费,他们在当地的酒吧、百货公司和其他生意上花的钱也随之减少了,这些生意很快也关门了,把市中心变成了鬼城。
 
Stephen Shore在 1977 年那个历史性的夏天拍摄的一系列照片中捕捉到了这一艰深的时刻,为《财富》杂志的一篇题为“钢铁镇的艰难时刻”的文章做了阐释图片。 [3]肖尔的故事暗示了这样一个事实,即人们面临的问题不仅仅是物质问题:它们也是精神问题。所有的灾难都会带来实际的困难,但有些灾难也会改变我们对自己的看法。起初,一种自我毁灭行为的像传染病一般慢慢地、不知不觉地在这些从前乐观的城镇生根发芽。在 1970 年代后期,所谓的“绝望之死”——自杀、吸毒过量和与酒精相关的死亡——在美国工人阶级白人中开始上升,尽管他们在几乎所有其他人群中的比率都在下降,包括受过大学教育的美国白人,所有社会阶层的欧洲人,以及在 1980 年代严重传染病肆虐之后,美国黑人中这一比率也下降了。”到 2015 年,白人工人阶级因绝望而死亡的人数如此之高,以至于美国的整体预期寿命自 2015 年以来首次下降到低于1980 年代艾滋病流行的高峰期的水平。
 
起初,钢铁镇的人们试图反击。许多人在新政的观念中长大,认为政府的目的是帮助人们解决问题。他们举行了反对关闭工厂的示威活动,并呼吁Jimmy Carter政府提供融资和贷款担保,以便至少可以挽救一些工厂[5]。
 
Carter几乎什么都没做[6]。 Steeltown的人们不知道的是,长期以来为劳工辩护并依靠其支持的民主党已经发生了战略性的转变。 [7] 1974 年,在大萧条很久之后,一批新的民主党议员抵达华盛顿,他们在富裕中长大。他们狂热的想重振正在欧佩克石油禁运之下下摇摇欲坠的美国经济,所以他们放弃了民主党的许多基本原则,包括放弃了之前承诺的对银行业和行业进行监管来确保相对经济平等。与他们那些对垄断和资本持警惕和怀疑态度的新政前辈们不同,这些新民主党人倾向于同意他们共和党同僚的观点,即过度监管正在扼杀增长。结果,卡特开始了一项大规模的放松管制计划,该计划一直持续到今天,并且几乎或根本没有帮助劳工应对这些变化。 [8]
 
民主党战略执行者知道该党会付出政治代价,但正如Matt Stoller在《歌利亚:垄断力量与民主之间的百年战争》中所写,他们认为可以牺牲蓝领工人,理由是他们仍然可以用非裔美国人、女权主义者和像他们一样富裕、年轻、受过大学教育的白人,拼凑出一个仍然使他们获胜的基本盘。
 
他们错了。在 1980 年的竞选活动中,Ronald Reagan甚至对访问俄亥俄州和宾夕法尼亚州的萧条钢铁城镇都犹豫不决,更不用说发表演讲了。 [9]毕竟,在 1976 年,卡特仅从俄亥俄州Mahoning Valley的两个县获得了 129,000 张选票,从而使民主党人仅以 11,000 张选票赢得了俄亥俄州。 [10]但是,当里根于 10 月抵达Mahoning Valley的工会据点Youngstown时,他对Jones和Laughlin钢铁厂工人的热情接待感到惊喜。 “我们受够了,我们很害怕。”一名工人告诉华盛顿邮报记者。 “为什么不给Reagan一个机会?[11] 在一次即兴演讲中,Reagan没有做出具体承诺,但表示他不会忘记他那天所见并指责Carter造成的问题。民主党在Mahoning Valley的领先地位[12] 并且Reagan在 11 月赢得了俄亥俄州。
 
当这些工人听到Reagan的“政府就是问题”的口号时,一定产生了深刻的共鸣。民主党人以花钱而闻名,但不是在对他们有意义的事情上。随着民主党推动生殖权利、同性恋权利和有色人种的赋权,被遗留在Steeltown的工人阶级白人愈发感到被剥夺和利用了,并且无法为自己发声。这加深了种族主义和性别歧视情绪,仿佛与恐同症作斗争、支持有色人种的平等机会和捍卫生育权这些运动,同维护工人阶级白人群体自身的利益是一场零和游戏。 [13]
 
里根带来了合并、裁员和恶意收购,这些都没有帮助Steeltown的人民。但他也设法将人们的愤怒从华尔街转移到了骗社保的人、吸毒者、伊斯兰恐怖分子、环保主义者、女权主义者、移民和其他民主党人似乎正在关爱的群体身上。Reagan的基督教盟友也提倡强有力的福音派信条,它鼓励人们要么寻求凌驾于政府权力之上的力量,要么寻求自己内心的力量来解决他们的问题。
 
当民主党最终重新夺回白宫时,比尔克林顿贬低了监管和劳工的要求,并支持北大西洋自由贸易协定和世界贸易组织,这为墨西哥和中国带来了更多的就业机会。他还从民主党纲领中删除了1880 年引入的“反托拉斯”一词。 [14]
 
Steeltown 积怨已久,2016 年希拉里·克林顿仅以 3% 的选票赢得了Mahoning Valley。 2020 年,它自尼克松 1972 年以压倒性获胜以来,首次在共和党和民主党之间摇摆。
 
正如Stoller指出的那样,新政时代的政客们预测这会发生。他们知道民主与极端的贫富分化是不相容的,并担心猖獗的不平等会助长具有法西斯倾向的特朗普式煽动者的崛起,他们承诺代表一个自认为被剥夺权利的愤怒的乌合之众摧毁无视这些的国家机构。这就是为什么Woodrow Wilson和FDR(罗斯福)制定政策来对抗不平等,并通过反并购立法、成立证券交易委员会并对银行和公司的反竞争策略调查;这也是为什么他们采取措施规范股市。对技术发明实行强制许可,以便小公司分享利润,并通过《格拉斯-斯蒂格尔法案》和其他措施拆分大型公用事业和银行。
 
美国很快就变成了一个战场,不仅仅是政策,而是什么是真的,什么是正义的,什么是道德的,甚至什么是现实的。民主党认为对寻求庇护者不公平的,特朗普的支持者认为是对自己的公平。民主党人认为是遏制地球生存威胁所必需的法规,特朗普的支持者认为这是自作主张的的气候怪人治安官的手铐,并认为其zhen shi目的是赶走工业并进一步使他们陷入贫困。[15] 那些民主党人认为特朗普损害了民主的,他的那些“国会大厦风暴”支持者认为是对民主的热血捍卫,等等。到 2020 年,特朗普的钢铁城支持者被痛苦蒙蔽了双眼,以至于他们没有注意到,即使他们的候选人妖魔化了华尔街,他也给了富豪们大幅减税的政策,但却什么都没有给他们。
 
Shore的钢铁之城的大多数照片都出奇地人烟稀少,但他确实捕捉到了人们在巨大打击之后的呆滞的面部表情,这些面部表情掩盖了他们色彩缤纷的70年代服装和羊排鬓角。就好像他们刚刚被告知他们得了一种可怕的疾病。即使是那些试图微笑的人也知道一切都变了。这种感觉就是你意识到你原先以为尊重你并为你代言的机构背叛了你,你的世界裂开了。
 

Helen Epstein 

By its end, much of the optimism of the twentieth century had faded. Towns and cities in the heartland that used to produce steel, glass, furniture, or shoes, and that are fondly remembered by people in their seventies as having been great places to grow up, have been gutted, their factories closed and shops boarded up. In the wreckage, the temptations of alcohol and drugs lured many to their deaths. Most of these stories are never told.[1]

 

Americans born in the two decades following World War I grew up in an atmosphere of prosperity and hope. Between 1945 and 1970, US production of goods and services quadrupled, and much of the country began to take its modern form, with highways, motels and office buildings. By 1971, virtually every American household had a refrigerator, a washing machine, a TV and a vacuum cleaner and one in three had more than one car.[2] Sure, there were problems, but wages, especially for manual workers, were rising, some of the worst legal barriers to racial equality were gradually being dismantled and, at least at first, the futile horrors of Vietnam were not widelv known.
 
But as children born in those years went to work, doors were beginning to close. The trouble started in the factory towns of Ohio, Pennsylvania and upstate New York and then spread nationwide. In 1976 and 1977 Bethlehem Steel laid off 3,500 workers in Lackawanna, New York and 3,500 more in Johnstown, Ohio, tripling the unemployment rate there in just one summer. In tiny Conshohoken, Pennsylvania (population 10,000) Alan Wood Steel laid off 3,000 people. Millions more good manufacturing jobs would be lost in the coming decades, as factories downsized, moved abroad or shut down completely. Even if some laid off workers received severance, they now spent less money at local bars, department stores and other business, which soon closed too, rendering downtowns into ghost towns.
 
Stephen Shore captured this profound moment in a series of photographs made during the fateful summer of 1977 to illustrate a Fortune Magazine article entitled, "Hard Times Come to Steeltown".[3] Shore's story alludes to the fact that the problems people faced weren't just material: they were spiritual too. All calamities cause practical hard-ship, but some also change how we see ourselves. Slowly, impereeptibly at first, an epidemic of self-destructive behavior took root in these formerly optimistic towns. In the late 1970s, so-called "deaths of despair"- suicides, drug overdoses and alcohol-related deaths- began rising in US working class whites, even as their rates were falling in almost all other populations, including college-educated US whites, Europeans of all social classes, and, after the ravages of the 1980s crack epidemic, among US Blacks as well' By 2015, deaths of despair among working class whites had risen so high that overall US life expectancy was falling for the first time since the height of the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s.
 
At first, the people of Steeltown tried to fight back. Many had grown up with the New Deal notion that the purpose of government was to help people with their problems. They staged demonstrations against the factory closings and called on Jimmy Carter's Administration to provide financing and loan guarantees so that at least some of the factories could be saved[5].
 
Carter did virtually nothing[6]. What the people of Steeltown didn't know was that the Democratic Party which had long defended labor and counted on its support, had undergone a strategie shift.[7] In 1974, a new cohort of Democratic lawmakers arrived in Washington who'd grown up in affluence, long after the Great Depression. They were keen to get the economy, staggering under the OPEC oil embargo, moving again, SO they jettisoned many of the Democratic Party's foundational principles, including a commitment to the use of banking and industry regulations to ensure relative economic equality. Unlike their New Deal predecessors who were vigilant anti-monopolists, suspicious of capital, these new Democrats tended to agree with their Republican peers that over-regulation was stifling growth. As a result, Carter began a massive deregulation program that continues to this day and did little or nothing to help labor cope with the changes.[8]
 
Democratic strategists knew the party would pay political costs, but as Matt Stoller writes in Goliath: The Hundred-Year War between Monopoly Power and Democracy, they saw blue collar workers as expendable, reasoning that they could still cobble together a winning coalition of African Americans, feminists, and affluent, young, college-educated whites like themselves.
 
They were mistaken. During the 1980 campaigns, Ronald Reagan was hesitant to even visit the depressed steel towns of Ohio and Pennsylvania, let alone give a speech.[9] After all, in 1976, Carter had secured 129,000 votes from just two counties in Ohio's Mahoning Valley, enabling the Democrats to win Ohio by just 11,000 votes.[10] But when Reagan arrived in Youngstown, Mahoning Valley's labor union stronghold, in October, he was pleasantly surprised by the warm reception he received from workers at a Jones and Laughlin steel factory. "We're fed up and we're scared." one worker told a Washington Post reporter. "Why not give Reagan a chance?[11] In an impromptu speech, Reagan made no specific promises, but said he wouldn't forget what he'd seen that day and blamed Carter for the problems. The Democratic lead in the Mahoning Valley shrank considerably,[12] and Reagan won Ohio in November.
 
When these workers heard Reagan's "government is the problem" slogan, it must have resonated deeply. The Democrats were known for spending money, but not on the things that made sense to them. As Democrats pushed for reproductive rights, gay rights and the empowerment of people of color, the working-class whites left behind in Steeltown felt increasingly disenfranchised and voiceless. This deepened racist and sexist sentiment, as if fighting homophobia, supporting equal opportunities for people of color and defending reproductive rights were a zero-sum game, played at their own expense.[13]
 
Reagan brought the merger, downsizing and the hostile takeover, none of which helped the people of Steeltown. But he also managed to channel people's anger away from Wall Street and towards welfare scroungers, crack addiets, Islamist terrorists, environmentalists, feminists, immigrants, and others whom the Democrats seemed to be mollycoddling. Reagan's Chris tian allies also promoted a muscular evangelical creed, which encouraged people to look either to powers supposedly higher than government or inside themselves for solutions to their problems.
 
When the Democrats finally regained the White House, Bill Clinton disparaged regulation and labor's demands, and supported the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement and the World Trade Organization, which shipped more jobs to Mexico and China. He also removed the word "antitrust", introduced in 1880, from the Democratic platform.[14]
 
Steeltown simmered and in 2016 Hillary Clinton won the Mahoning Valley by just 3% of the vote. In 2020, it swung Republican for the first time since Nixon's 1972 landslide.
 
As Stoller points out, the New Deal era politicians predicted this would happen. They knew democracy was incompatible with extremes of wealth and poverty and feared that rampant inequality would foster the rise of Trump-like demagogues with fascist tendencies, who promised to smash the nation's oblivious institutions on behalf of an angry rabble that saw itself as disenfranchised. That's why Woodrow Wilson and FDR created policies precisely to counter inequality and went after concentrated wealth with anti-merger legislation, the creation of the Security and Exchange Commission, and investigations into the anticompetitive tactics of banks and companies; it's also why they took steps to regulate the stock market. create compulsory licensing of technological discoveries so small firms conla share in the profits, and break up big utilities and banks through the Glass- Steagall Act, and other measures.
 
America soon became a battlefield, not just over policies, but over what is true, what is just, what is moral, and even what is real. What Democrats saw as injustice to asylum seekers, Trump's supporters saw as justice towards themselves. What Democrats saw as regulations necessary to staunch existential threats to the planet, Trump's supporters saw as the handeuffs of self-appointed climate-kook vigilantes, whose real aim was to drive away industry and further impoverish them.[15] What Democrats saw as Trump's attack on democracy, his Capitol-storming supporters saw as a spirited defense of democracy, and so on. By 2020, Trump's Steeltown supporters were so blinded by bitterness that they failed to notice that even as their candidate demonized Wall Street, he gave its plutocrats a massive tax cut and them almost nothing.
 
Most of the photographs in Shore's Steel Town are eerily depopulated, but the stunned facial expressions of the people he does capture belie their colorful 70s outfits and mutton chop sideburns. It's as if they'd just been told moments before that they have a terrible disease. Even those who attempt to smile know everything has changed. This is what it feels like to learn that the institutions you thought respected you and spoke for you have turned alien, and your world has split in two.

Helen Epstein
 
 
1 Anne Case and Angus Deaton, Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism, Princeton University Press, 2019, p.28.
2 Howard Zinn, Postwar America: 1945-1971. Bobbs-Merrill, 1973.
3 Lee Smith, 'Hard Times Come to Steeltown', Fortune Magazine, December 1977, pp. 86-93.
4 Case and Deaton, Deaths of Despair, quoted in Helen Epstein, "Left Behind" The New York Review of Books. March 26, 2020
5 Roger Wilkins. "Carter Rejects a Plan to Reopen Steel Plant in Ohio. The New York Times, March 31 1919, https://www.nytimes.com/1979/03/31/archives/carter-reiects-a-plan-to-reopen-steel-plant-in-ohio-agreement-with.html
6 Ibid
7 Matt Stoller, Goliath: The Hundred-Year War between Monopoly Power and Democracy. Simon and Schuster. 2019
8 Matt Stoller, "How Democrats Killed Their Populist Soul" The Atlantic, October 24 2016, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/how-democrats-killed-their-populist-soul/504710/.
9 "Looking for the Union Label", The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1980/10/10/looking-for-the-union-label/9366c4cf-1495-4fba-a554-b3a0c5f444c7/
10 Fortune Magazine, December 1977, p. 92.
11 "Looking for the Union Label", https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1980/10/10/looking-for-the-union-label/9366c4cf-1495-4fba-a554-63a0c5f444c7/.
12 "Mahoning County, Ohio", 4. Politics, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahoning_County, Ohio#Politics
13 Arlie Hochschild, Strangers in their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right. The New Press 2016
14 Stoller, "How the Democrats Killed" https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/how-demccrats-killed-their-populist-soul/504/10/.
15 Hochschild, Strangers in their own Land.